17:00:02 #startmeeting DC26 orga team meeting. https://deb.li/dc26meet 17:00:02 Meeting started Tue Feb 10 17:00:02 2026 UTC. The chair is pwaring. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:03 #topic Roll call 17:00:06 as always, say hi if you're here 17:00:09 hi 17:00:15 Hello o/ 17:00:15 ¡buenas! 17:00:29 hola! 17:00:36 finally-, been a while 17:00:39 Hello 17:00:51 Hi 17:01:38 hola a todos! 17:01:52 o/ ! 17:03:02 #topic DC25: Videos 17:03:38 hola! 17:04:00 Nothing new to say 17:04:05 k 17:04:15 #topic DC26: Sponsors 17:04:41 not sure if we have any new sponsors but the home page is filling up! 17:04:44 https://debconf26.debconf.org/ 17:05:59 sahil has been reaching out to a lot of sponsors 17:06:13 and we are getting positive feedbacks in 17:06:38 so all good. More leads welcome still! 17:07:05 #topic DC26: Bursaries and visas 17:07:26 last time we said we were still waiting for the the university to resume work 17:07:53 about visas : FICH (Faculty) tells me they can't specify how long they need for visa invitation letters, as it depends on the university. 17:08:01 To request invitation letters for each person, we need to send personal data, passport information, and details of the task they will perform at the congress 17:08:11 They suggest we send applications in batches as they arrive, one batch per week or similar. 17:08:35 I think we can start with a group of people we know who intend to come and request the first letters 17:08:41 Sounds good 17:09:05 Plus, we can approach people that we _know_ that come from “difficult” countries, to have them in this early batch 17:10:43 do we need to say anything on bursaries at this point? 17:11:06 I think we linked them on the agenda due to there being a lot of overlap 17:11:13 Do we want to ask for partial contributions again? 17:11:26 how was the outcome last year? 17:11:28 I thought that was mostly a one-time thing for last year 17:11:37 tumblingweed, sorry, my answer to that question didn't pass the gitlab emailing system last night 17:11:49 tumblingweed, do we have a reason to remove it? 17:12:04 with funding being difficult, I think maybe we should keep it 17:12:04 It raised money, but also rubbed people up the wrong way 17:12:09 oh 17:12:14 I don't think we needed the money in the end 17:12:58 How much are we counting on it for the budget? 17:14:07 My interpretation of reactions there is based on the recent for debian-private thread 17:14:08 I don't see it budgeted 17:14:53 (I missed those reactions, BTW) 17:15:03 I don't recall a specific item for that. 17:15:33 WRT budget, we'd need to review the income:hotel entry 17:16:25 shall we come back to that question next time, unless we need to answer it now 17:16:44 We do need an answer ASAP 17:17:21 do we have Hotel prices now? 17:17:32 we wouldn't have any income until we finish defining the bursaries 17:18:09 Well hotel prices we don't need now 17:18:14 We don't have the final prices yet, we have an estimate. 17:18:32 martinbayo[mds]: we have quite good indication of the prices, not the definitive quantities 17:18:48 But /me guesses we can work with that 17:18:59 tumblingweed: if we sell rooms, we'd need them, not? 17:20:35 tumblingweed, if you think partial contributions make things too complex, let's remove them 17:21:23 I worry that they encourage the people who need bursaries the most to pay more 17:21:48 Ok, glad theres agreement that we can drop it 17:22:08 I think it is a useful tool, to raise money, though... 17:22:41 probably it could benefit from a different wording, or giving more context, or ... 17:22:54 may be next year 17:22:56 yeah 17:23:05 ok I'll mark that as agreed 17:23:13 :check: :) 17:23:14 +1 17:23:34 #agreed not to ask for partial contributions this year 17:23:48 anything else on bursaries and visas? 17:25:10 #topic DC26: Registration 17:26:08 we have still some pending work in website 17:27:01 most of our last tasks are finished 17:27:07 is there anything else blocking registration opening? 17:27:20 e.g. budget items 17:28:07 iirc, only website side need to be finished 17:28:27 Do you have an estimate for what is needed to get it going? 17:28:43 A handful of bugs known at this point 17:29:03 So, get the fixes landed and test more 17:29:08 yep 17:29:16 Maybe today/tomorrow we open 17:29:32 yes 17:29:42 Was there an outstanding invoicing question for Debian France? 17:29:47 👍 17:29:49 coolio, I guess one or two days more are not an issue over being more bug free 17:30:00 yes 17:30:17 (-sponsors' channel) 17:30:30 Ok, so sponsor invoicing, not attendee 17:30:44 as much as I know, yes 17:32:10 Any more teams want to move onto zammad this year? Content? Bursaries? 17:32:32 tumblingweed: lets chat about it after the meeting 17:32:42 I'm not sure what Zammad can bring us 17:32:57 Ok 17:34:05 anything else on registration? 17:34:20 not from my side 17:34:46 #topic Meeting schedule 17:34:58 next meeting will be 24th February, 17:00 UTC as always 17:35:01 #topic AOB 17:35:04 anything else before we finish? 17:35:07 yes please! 17:35:23 I wanted to raise the point that we (as in DebConf-committee) are running late 17:35:32 We should be working on the DC27 bids 17:35:37 but... We haven't done so 17:35:58 As for me, I'm quite out of (time|spoons) to push this... So I have pestered others a bit 17:36:09 but so far, we have not moved (and we need to move soon). 17:36:27 That's it, just wanted it to be made public. 17:36:41 do you need volunteers? 17:37:55 I don't know. It is a task we must do as committee 17:38:06 (i.e. it is a core point of our delegation!) 17:38:13 gwolf: I will try to push this 17:38:19 terceiro: ♥ 17:38:25 I think we will need to postpone the calendar a bit 17:38:31 right 17:38:36 but not too much! 17:38:50 yeah 17:39:08 we were supposed to have the bid review meeting this Fri which is obviously not gonna work 17:40:07 Right. but having the process kickstarted in the next ~2 wk or so would be great... 17:42:46 ok, thanks everyone for coming and see you in two weeks! 17:42:47 #endmeeting