==================== #debian-ctte Meeting ==================== Meeting started by marga at 17:59:25 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ctte/2021/debian-ctte.2021-01-20-17.59.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (marga, 17:59:28) * Review of previous meetings AIs (marga, 18:00:46) * LINK: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tech-ctte/-/commit/096c18b0707a81530f56435a921139b7aab80d32 (marga, 18:05:17) * #971515 - kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries) (marga, 18:06:48) * ACTION: spwhitton to send the drafted reply declining to overrule (marga, 18:07:18) * #975075 - Should NetworkManager support elogind? (marga, 18:08:01) * LINK: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1221865/accepted-udisks2-291-3-source-into-unstable/ (marga, 18:08:35) * ACTION: marga to draft a closing statement, explaining what happened and why we are declining to overrule, but encouraging people to talk to each other as much as possible. (marga, 18:16:17) * #975381 - libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation (marga, 18:17:03) * ACTION: gwolf will close the bug presenting the TC's answer (gwolf, 18:22:56) * ACTION: gwolf to encourage them to resubmit if they can rephrase in the context of Debian and with a better summary? (marga, 18:24:21) * #976462 - Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? (marga, 18:25:31) * ACTION: spwhitton to ping doko for more input regarding this bug. (marga, 18:29:46) * ACTION: spwhitton to ping the old bug asking whether it's still relevant. (marga, 18:37:18) * #978636 - move to merged-usr-only? (marga, 18:37:43) * LINK: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/03/msg00001.html (marga, 18:42:58) * ACTION: spwhitton to start a vote on us agreeing to usrmerge being mandatory for bookworm+, without ruling on the technical details, assuming a technical migration can be agreed on. any action/implementations on this should happen in experimental/otherwise outside the critical path for bullseye (marga, 18:59:21) * Possible future Python issue (marga, 19:01:24) * LINK: https://archive.is/eqtdf here is an archive of the discussion on GitHub (which is not an official forum) (ehashman, 19:03:20) * ehashman to continue working with doko and tumbleweed to address upstream concerns about Python packaging in Debian for bullseye and bookworm+ cycles (ehashman, 19:16:52) * Recruitment efforts (marga, 19:19:39) * ACTION: ntyni to write to the nominee asking if they are willing to join (marga, 19:25:18) * ACTION: marga to have a go at fil's script to ask for more nominees. (marga, 19:25:28) Meeting ended at 19:25:55 UTC. Action Items ------------ * spwhitton to send the drafted reply declining to overrule * marga to draft a closing statement, explaining what happened and why we are declining to overrule, but encouraging people to talk to each other as much as possible. * gwolf will close the bug presenting the TC's answer * gwolf to encourage them to resubmit if they can rephrase in the context of Debian and with a better summary? * spwhitton to ping doko for more input regarding this bug. * spwhitton to ping the old bug asking whether it's still relevant. * spwhitton to start a vote on us agreeing to usrmerge being mandatory for bookworm+, without ruling on the technical details, assuming a technical migration can be agreed on. any action/implementations on this should happen in experimental/otherwise outside the critical path for bullseye * ntyni to write to the nominee asking if they are willing to join * marga to have a go at fil's script to ask for more nominees. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * doko * spwhitton to ping doko for more input regarding this bug. * gwolf * gwolf will close the bug presenting the TC's answer * gwolf to encourage them to resubmit if they can rephrase in the context of Debian and with a better summary? * marga * marga to draft a closing statement, explaining what happened and why we are declining to overrule, but encouraging people to talk to each other as much as possible. * marga to have a go at fil's script to ask for more nominees. * ntyni * ntyni to write to the nominee asking if they are willing to join * spwhitton * spwhitton to send the drafted reply declining to overrule * spwhitton to ping doko for more input regarding this bug. * spwhitton to ping the old bug asking whether it's still relevant. * spwhitton to start a vote on us agreeing to usrmerge being mandatory for bookworm+, without ruling on the technical details, assuming a technical migration can be agreed on. any action/implementations on this should happen in experimental/otherwise outside the critical path for bullseye * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * marga (88) * ehashman (86) * spwhitton (82) * smcv (77) * gwolf (75) * ansgar (20) * ntyni (12) * bremner (11) * doko (5) * MeetBot (2) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot