19:00:01 #startmeeting 19:00:01 Meeting started Wed Jun 17 19:00:01 2026 UTC. The chair is carnil. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 19:00:09 hi 19:00:14 #chair bwh ukleinek waldi 19:00:14 Current chairs: bwh carnil ukleinek waldi 19:00:23 hi welcome to todays meeting 19:00:24 we could just do /exec cat 20260617.md and call it a day :-) 19:00:27 o/ 19:00:36 hello o/ 19:00:43 03kernel-sec 05pipeline 06Salvatore Bonaccorso 1110769 * [4 minutes and 3 seconds] 03success (pages: success; issue-syntax: success; python-static: success) 19:00:43 03kernel-sec 05pipeline 06Salvatore Bonaccorso 1110769 * [4 minutes and 3 seconds] running (pages: success; issue-syntax: success; python-static: success) 19:00:47 03kernel-sec 05pipeline 06Salvatore Bonaccorso 1110769 * [4 minutes and 3 seconds] 03success (pages: success; issue-syntax: success; python-static: success) 19:00:48 is there anything someone wants to discuss before we go to the planned agenda items? 19:00:55 idk 19:01:08 hi eamanu welcome 19:01:18 thanks! :) 19:01:29 nothing from my side 19:01:36 let's start with the bugs 19:01:45 #topic #1126671: (S, ) linux-image-6.17.13+deb13-amd64: Disconnect root (path=/) during heavy load on NvME, partial corruption on NTFS.crash soon but not yet 19:01:50 * ukleinek looks at eamanu and wonders if their presence means anything for the agenda 19:02:12 i time for that 19:02:17 s/i/no/ 19:02:18 I have here in the notes that we wait for an available timeslot from bwh or waldi to look closer 19:02:23 yes 19:02:26 so we keep that state I guess 19:02:41 #topic #1138242: (S, u) linux-image-6.12.90+deb13.1-riscv64-dbg and linux-image-6.12.90+deb13.1-s390x-dbg have an undeclared file conflict 19:02:56 The bug has an update from waldi, still ongoing work? 19:03:10 (it remains on our radar due to severity) 19:03:13 i have patches, but not submitted 19:03:20 six architectures affected 19:03:29 submitted means to salsa or upstream? 19:03:35 upstream 19:03:36 upstream I guess 19:03:49 ok then this is good hands! 19:04:04 #topic #1129033: (i, u) iwlwifi: WARNING in _iwl_mvm_sec_key_del with hostapd on 6.12.73+deb13-amd64 (AP mode) 19:04:33 Reporter said to have tested 6.1.162-1 which works, and 7.0.10-1 which as well works and do not trigger the problem 19:04:52 * ukleinek suspects a sensitive spam filter at gmx that explains why the reporter didn't get my mail 19:05:20 having looked at a git diff between v6.12.73..v7.0.10 in the respecive path for the driver I did not spot something "interesting" which would explain the fix 19:06:01 any ideas here? 19:06:18 #action ukleinek looks into #1129033 and ask for a bisect if he doesn't spot anything in the affected version range 19:06:34 thanks ukleinek 19:06:48 #topic #1138755: (i, u) Subject: amdgpu: RX 640 hangs right after VCE initialization on kernel 6.12 (i5-11400F, no iGPU) (forwarded: gitlab.freedesktop.org) 19:07:32 this is in good hands, upstrema issue contains a tentative patch, which the reporter has tested, so next this should go by them to mainline and we can track the fix (add a closes tag on the respective upload) 19:07:39 so wait for us 19:07:44 ack 19:07:56 #topic #1139599: (i, u) linux-base-7.0.10+deb14-amd64: amdgpu (ttm?) two Oops, locking the computer (forwarded: amd-gfx) 19:08:11 apparently there were similar/same issues reported. So wait for progress from upstream 19:08:19 ack++ 19:08:27 #topic 1140074: (i, ) linux-image-7.0.10+deb13-amd64: excessive "icmp: detected local route for xx" logs 19:08:59 Unseen/unreproducible issue so far. I asked for some details on the networking setup and to ad information from reportbug bugscript to the bug 19:09:16 but if someone has additional ideas what we can do or ask here? 19:09:33 sounds like an issue that is specific to the reporter's local network 19:10:09 network routing tables. the source talks about race conditions between route modifications, but this does not make sense 19:11:28 it's a race between lookup and change 19:11:43 * carnil looks up is ip r output included in the networking part of our bug scripts? 19:12:18 `ip r` alone might not contain all relevant info 19:13:02 This is `net_warn_ratelimited("detected local route for %pI4 during ICMP sending, src %pI4\n", ...)`, right? 19:13:43 the unblackened message might already help ... 19:15:05 should I followup to my questions and ask explitily for logs with at most only the ip masked out + routing tables information? 19:15:07 (in combination with `ip a; ip r showdump` 19:15:28 we might as well wait 19:15:34 ok I will ask that as followup and then wait 19:15:55 `ip r showdump` does something different than I expected 19:16:04 so only ask for `ip r` (for now) 19:16:30 #action ask as followp to #1140074 to include the log (possibly maksing out the IP) and `ip r` output 19:16:48 #topic #1117449: (n, ) linux-image-6.16.9+deb14-amd64: Lots of oom killed processes (merged with #1139567) 19:17:14 nothing really new here. We discussed that last week on jitsi meeting. @benh had action to take keeper look. 19:17:37 * ukleinek nods 19:17:47 I suspect we can keep that and as in the first bug wait for an available timeslot with low prio from bwh, but I will ask him is he is fine 19:18:01 #topic #1139265: (n, ) linux-image-7.0.10+deb14-amd64: QXL graphics crash, processes stuck in D state, NULL-dereference errors, TTY-subsystem malfunction 19:18:13 Followup from reporter (after switching machine type for qemu). But some differences to original report. 19:18:31 waldi: do you intend to further look into this again? 19:19:08 i will look again 19:19:39 #action waldi will look into #1139265 19:19:44 thank you! 19:19:45 "underlying kernel bug that makes unrelated processes hang" is explained by "is deprecated and might be broken", isn't it? 19:20:58 nothing unrelated 19:21:03 in this bug 19:21:12 * ukleinek nods 19:21:26 #topic ok let's move to the next 19:21:36 ups 19:21:38 +1 19:21:45 #topic #1139269: (n, M) tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -62 19:21:51 Wait. @ukleinek asked for more information. 19:21:56 * ukleinek nods 19:22:03 #topic #1139676: (n, uM) Multiple drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c kernel log 19:22:10 Waiting for reporter to provide requested information. 19:22:20 #topic #1139686: (n, +) Please enable CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_HOOK (forwarded: linux!1976) 19:22:42 I think this should be fine to be merged and possibly marked as to be backported 19:23:18 if there are no objections then I would merge the change 19:23:31 MR looks straight forward, fine for me 19:24:00 ukleinek: then you can approve it on salsa 19:24:22 ok next topics 19:24:31 #topic #1139942: (n, ) linux-image-amd64: Desktop reboots upon resume from suspend 19:24:31 03linux 05debian/latest 06Uwe Kleine-König * [approved] merge request !1976: net/netfilter: Enable NETFILTER_NETLINK_HOOK as module * 14https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1976 19:25:01 New report. Regression between 6.12.88-1 and 6.12.90-2. Asked already for bisection. -> wait 19:25:13 #topic #1139950: (n, ) amdgpu carrizo: no display signal after modeset 19:25:34 Again a regresion, now between 6.12.63-1 and 6.12.69-1 . Asked as well to bisect 19:25:41 * ukleinek wonders if we need a note in the bisect instruction about unreliable triggers 19:26:18 do you want to provide an updated version for the instructions? 19:26:28 hmm, probably not, when the result looks wrong and we have the bisect log this can be handled 19:26:37 ok! 19:26:48 #topic #1138985: (w, +) linux-image-amd64: Please enable CONFIG_OXP_EC for OneXPlayer handheld battery charge threshold support (forwarded: linux!1971) 19:26:52 (but if something like that happens, I can provide the followup instructions) 19:27:10 there is a merge request for that as well, which needs to be reviewed 19:28:16 the updated changelog entry is a different one than the MR above, so one of them needs careful merging 19:28:28 s/one/at least one/ 19:28:46 03linux 05debian/latest 06Uwe Kleine-König * [approved] merge request !1971: [amd64] Enable CONFIG_OXP_EC as module * 14https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1971 19:28:57 the user has done testing it works afaiu, so we can merge it I would say. 19:29:26 03linux 05debian/latest 06Uwe Kleine-König * [update] merge request !1971: [amd64] Enable CONFIG_OXP_EC as module * 14https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1971 19:29:36 I can do, will ask to slightly adapt the changelog entry to name as well the "subsystem" 19:29:47 * ukleinek added the backport-6.12 label 19:30:00 03linux 05debian/latest 06Salvatore Bonaccorso * [update] merge request !1971: [amd64] Enable CONFIG_OXP_EC as module * 14https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1971 19:30:03 03linux 05debian/latest 06Uwe Kleine-König * [update] merge request !1971: [amd64] Enable CONFIG_OXP_EC as module * 14https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/1971 19:30:26 so we are done with the linux bugs 19:30:45 as bwh is not here tonight I would propose we skip the dracut and firmware-nonfree bugs? 19:31:04 oh cool RCE via dhcp 19:32:16 carnil: #1139725 only affects netboot setups I assume? 19:33:18 * ukleinek wonders how relevant that is, given that the root-dir can also be set by the dhcp server (at least I think that's the case), that also allows to compromise a machine 19:33:54 afaiu is it sas well only in the 35network-legacy, but we haven't looked further so far apart filling a tracking bug as per above 19:34:16 * ukleinek nods 19:34:56 ok to move to the last topics? 19:35:00 hmm, what is isenkram-autoinstall-firmware? 19:35:12 (only thinking aloud, no need for an answer) 19:36:54 #topic Migration excuses 19:36:54 * ukleinek doesn't understand why linux-signed-amd64 doesn't migrate 19:37:38 "Will attempt migration" means it waits for the next dinstall run? 19:37:47 linux not migrating is just release team asking to make a hint to let it in? At least I do not see what is wrong right now 19:38:33 but it says already: 19:38:36 Migration status for linux (7.0.10-1 to 7.0.12-2): Will attempt migration due to a hint (Any information below is purely informational) 19:38:37 linux has "Will attempt migration due to a hint" 19:38:51 so also only waits for next dinstall? 19:39:07 right, wait and then otherwise ask release team 19:39:13 sounds right 19:39:20 #topic New upstream versions 19:39:33 nothing in the table (apart the usual firmware-free) 19:39:41 #topic Merge requests 19:39:54 is there any merge request in particular someone wants to discuss? 19:41:15 * ukleinek marks a few for him to look into, nothing to discuss now 19:41:33 ok perfect, thanks ukleinek for looking into some 19:41:37 #topic AoB 19:41:44 who whill chair next week? 19:41:52 who will chair next week? 19:41:57 * ukleinek can do that 19:42:13 #action ukleinek will chair next week 19:42:15 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... asigned :) 19:42:41 so we are done for tonight, thanks all for attending and giving input on the topics! 19:42:45 \o/ 19:42:53 #endmeeting