14:01:05 #startmeeting 14:01:05 Meeting started Thu Sep 24 14:01:05 2026 UTC. The chair is charles. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 14:01:11 o/ 14:01:13 Beuc: hehe 14:01:16 o/ 14:01:18 sorry about the delay 14:01:28 #topic Roll Call 14:01:39 Please go ahead and announce your presence here 14:01:42 (again) 14:01:48 o/ 14:01:49 hi, again 14:01:50 hi 14:01:53 hi 14:01:56 * lamby → Chris Lamb 14:01:58 Hi 14:01:58 o/ 14:02:08 hello! o/ 14:02:18 o/ 14:02:49 \o 14:03:16 o/ 14:03:26 #topic New team members 14:03:59 no new team members 14:04:32 #topic Action item review 14:05:08 Action: What to do about Tesla Nvidia graphics drivers? Continue the discussion on the mailing list. 14:05:35 toby is not available today but mailed the TLDR 14:05:45 I'd suggest not to upgrade the tesla drivers at this time. (see https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2026/09/msg00043.html) 14:06:11 if someone has any input on this, I suggest to reply to the mailing list 14:06:37 o/ sorry for the delay 14:07:06 o/ np 14:07:15 I already replied there, my suggestion is to not do further updates 14:08:00 ack, then I think we can finish this topic and not carry over to the next meeting 14:09:02 agreed, unless tobi thinks there's more to discuss, in which case he can add it again 14:09:32 #action charles to drop the item from next meeting agenda (and ping tobi about it in case it needs to be re-added) 14:10:17 next item is Action: FD fellows to give feedback here: https://gitlab.com/freexian/services/deblts-team/debian-lts/-/work_items/98 14:10:39 haven’t done that yet but will do 14:11:08 it's the discussion about additional data added to CVEs and there is a discussion on SLA for lts/elts 14:11:31 o/ 14:11:33 though it's not restricted to only FDs 14:11:55 the feedback I mean 14:13:19 since we don't have many items on today's agenda, if someone has comments or feedback, it can be discussed here 14:15:19 I think my internal email about the FD role is related to this, and should perhaps be considered together 14:16:07 I think those of you who didn't try to set freexian_severity yet could give it a go for your next DLA/ELA upload. 14:16:28 +1 14:16:30 pochu: yes, I think it was mentioned in the previous meeting and/or the issue, I'll add the link to the pad 14:16:38 Focusing on high, critical (and unrated) issues. 14:17:28 pochu, I answer to the thread but since this is on the internal mailing list and with no archive to point at, I thought it would be better to discuss freexian_severity on the tracker. 14:19:02 freexian_severity and freexian_urgency really https://freexian.gitlab.io/services/deblts-team/documentation/lts/cve-additional-data.html 14:20:04 Beuc: you mean setting the freexian_severity even if it matches the calculated_severity or for the cases where critical and high are too much? 14:20:05 That would help understand how easy/hard it would be to support SLAs (time-to-fix). There are many cases and FD is just one of them. 14:21:18 charles, the goal is to do both. Confirm or readjust, but have an explicit freexian_severity (and urgency) for all CVEs for all supported packages. IIUC. 14:22:36 ack 14:22:37 Without Santiago we can't really discuss this in detail though, so we may want to postpone this for next time. Meanwhile we can keep experimenting. 14:23:54 Beuc: agree 14:23:58 The tooling is under development, so your feedback can become into real changes 14:24:41 More easily :) 14:24:58 #action move the topic to next meeting 14:25:52 #action contributors are encouraged to set freexian_severity and freexian_urgency on the next DLA/ELA upload and give ffedback on the tooling 14:26:47 I suggest to also give feedback on on the internal list 14:28:44 #action also give feedback to on the internal list which is a very related topic 14:29:48 #topic New topics (and eventual action items) 14:30:26 we have no new topics or action items on the pad, does anyone have a topic to discuss? 14:30:29 No news from the Debusine front. Next step remains creating Debusine-level repositories to additionally publish ELTS uploads. 14:31:09 ack 14:31:37 I hope we'll have much of that sorted in two months when some of the involved teams meet physically. 14:34:24 was there some discussion about providing snapshot-like features for the ELTS repo using debusine? like snapshot.debian.org or snapshot.ubuntu.com? 14:36:03 Debusine repositories generally provide snapshot-features (unless old artifacs are expired from collections). 14:36:25 So once, there is a Debusine-level repository, snapshot functionality exists. 14:36:30 well, I guess this would need to be a feature request from customers, anyway, it was a bit of curiosity because I'd find it usefull as a sysadmin of a large fleet 14:36:55 ack, so possible, nice 14:37:37 well, let's not delay the meeting only because of my curiosity 14:37:45 #topic AOB 14:37:55 no AOB in the pad 14:38:21 so if there is nothing else, we can move on to finish the meeting 14:39:24 #topic Next meeting 14:39:28 Next meeting: 2026-10-22 14:00 UTC [Location: Jitsi: https://jitsi.debian.social/LTS-monthly-meeting] 14:39:43 #endmeeting