19:28:51 #startmeeting 19:28:51 Meeting started Wed Mar 28 19:28:51 2018 UTC. The chair is sumpfralle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:28:51 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 19:28:55 hi 19:29:19 #chair h01ger TheSnide kenyon 19:29:19 Current chairs: TheSnide h01ger kenyon sumpfralle 19:30:02 who goes first with a topic? 19:30:39 #topic review last meeting 19:30:50 I asked chteuchteu today via email if he would help with the new website. 19:30:59 TheSnide uploaded the new release to sf. 19:31:23 I prepared a pull request for the SNMPConfig thing - kenyon please review 19:31:49 I did not yet do the cherry-picking from 2.0 to master :( 19:31:54 anything else? 19:32:37 sumpfralle: i usually "merge" from 2.0 to master 19:32:42 (when possible) 19:33:21 i'll issue 2.0.37 right no 19:33:23 w 19:33:30 great! 19:33:46 merge/cherry-pick: here we have quite different code branches - is merge suitable here? 19:34:37 if possible, merge is better. 19:34:49 specially in the stable->master way. 19:35:25 * TheSnide still thinks that bugfix should happen on stable first, then be merged into master. 19:35:52 uhm, cherry pick from 2.0 to master, else… things can become interesting 19:36:11 but anyway, i need to go afk now, sorry & have fun! 19:36:29 throwing in his opinion and letting us discuss :) 19:36:47 sumpfralle: do as you think is best 19:36:54 anyway: I will take a look, if merge is suitable or if I will get overwhelmed by the deviating code 19:36:57 good 19:37:11 * TheSnide is too low touch those days to have a strong voice :) 19:37:12 (and then i firmly believe things should move from master to 2.0 and not the other way round…) 19:37:54 h01ger: jajaja, but.... #ohwell :) 19:37:59 :) 19:38:06 *g* 19:38:44 TheSnide: I did not really follow the 0.35/0.36 issue: was it only the munin_stats plugin? 19:38:56 yup 19:39:01 and the .37 also 19:39:02 well, cgi graphing broke 19:39:10 but i should really run now 19:39:12 o/ 19:39:14 h01ger: the whole cgi ? 19:39:15 in general or only for this plugin? 19:39:25 run! 19:39:35 anyway 19:39:39 i thought it was only that plugin that emitted tons of warnings 19:39:43 see issue 939 and what bcg said here 19:39:44 three releases in a week - that is fantastic! :) 19:40:02 sumpfralle: s/fantastic/fukup/ ? :p 19:40:10 at least it is alive ... 19:40:30 indeed.... a little hysterical even... 19:40:37 but lovely! 19:40:41 new topic? 19:40:58 #topic 2.999 19:41:14 i pushed some fixing code in a PR 19:41:30 yes, and I just commented them five minutes ago 19:41:43 what do you think, is the current status of the branch? 19:41:54 basically it does remove the big datastructure in the munin-update, and updates everything on the fly 19:43:06 I had the feeling (based on bug reports), that graph config values are not stored, there, yet? 19:43:27 (just wild guess - ignore, if you disagree) 19:43:45 no, limits don't work yet 19:44:01 as the code does parse the datafile, which isn't here anymore 19:44:14 ah - right - I just found that in my notes :) 19:44:22 ... and i have to refactor it to take into account the sql. 19:44:51 I have a small list of items, that I want to ask you - I would do this somewhen outside of the meetings, or? 19:44:55 ... but to be honest, i'd like to delegate the actual computation to munin-update also, and be able to do it on the fly 19:45:01 sumpfralle: sure 19:45:04 cool 19:45:13 let's move it outside... +1 19:45:25 (but still here) 19:45:32 yes 19:45:50 so I would just repeat my plan of merge/cherry-pick changes from 2.0 to master 19:46:01 and then we discuss about a release next week? 19:46:31 I think, you documented the release for 2.0 very well - but I did not look for the new master approach (if there are differences) 19:46:38 hi all and sorry for being late.. 19:46:49 #chair dipohl 19:46:49 Current chairs: TheSnide dipohl h01ger kenyon sumpfralle 19:46:52 welcome! 19:47:23 (we are discussing 2.999 bits right now) 19:48:09 but TheSnide is missing for three minutes, so maybe let's postpone this? ... 19:48:20 Did you already had topic next release of stable 2.0? 19:48:37 yes, it was included in the first topic 19:48:41 ok 19:48:47 #action TheSnide will release 2.0.37 today 19:49:02 good! :) 19:49:12 #topic Gallery 19:49:18 [13munin] 15steveschnepp pushed 1 new commit to 06stable-2.0: 02https://git.io/vxa6Z 19:49:18 13munin/06stable-2.0 14ced8e85 15Steve Schnepp: 2.0.37 19:49:26 he just did :) 19:49:45 [13munin] 15steveschnepp tagged 062.0.37 at 14dacf89d: 02https://git.io/vxa6B 19:49:58 dipohl and me improved the gallery a bit and we would like to deploy it on gallery.m-m.o 19:50:03 who is in control of that server? 19:50:09 (I am not) 19:50:43 * dipohl has also no access 19:51:26 some I had ssm in mind? 19:51:56 yes he has, but he is not available as it seems 19:52:30 #action sumpralle asks ssm for access to gallery.m-m.o 19:52:40 ssm did change job, and therefore he doesn't have acces to either 19:52:47 it is possible that be0rn has access 19:53:07 who could contact him? 19:53:19 we can send a message here in chat 19:53:22 [13munin] 15kenyon commented on issue #945: Can you also include these related commits:... 02https://git.io/vxa67 19:53:38 or should me move it to the demo server? 19:54:01 (I do not know, what is attached to gallery.m-m.o - mails or similar?) 19:54:14 that would be a good workaround at least 19:54:27 TheSnide: who owns the demo server? 19:54:38 we can change the link in wiki accordingly 19:54:47 no - just change the DNS 19:54:52 (if we do this) 19:55:19 sumpfralle: it's Bushmills 19:55:19 sure, if you have access to that 19:55:26 but i have access 19:55:46 is it ok to move the gallery there or should we try to keep the other one? 19:56:20 I would prefer a server to which we have easy access 19:56:22 (I have no idea about the social network allowing us to use the server - thus I just ask blindly) 19:56:36 as there will be more changes following 19:56:50 e.g. the new website(!) 19:56:51 the links need to be adapted 19:57:08 when I move the wiki page about plugin gallery to the Guide 19:57:50 From my point of view, everything can go onto a single small server (just like the demo one, I guess). If we keep backups (I could arrange this), I could live with this easily. How about you? 19:58:02 +1 19:58:55 As the Munin-Gallery is also hosted on my server, we can also use that 19:59:17 yes, sounds also reasonable 19:59:21 I mean for the gallery 19:59:26 yes 19:59:33 Thus: who has access to the DNS zone? 19:59:59 * dipohl don't know 20:00:16 I guess, TheSnide is busy doing the finishing touches for the release announcements :) 20:00:17 possibly also be0rn 20:00:31 let us postpone this discussion to the next week? 20:00:35 ok 20:00:47 #info decide about the future gallery host 20:00:54 sumpfralle: indeed 20:00:56 #info find out, who is in control of DNS 20:01:01 good! :) 20:01:08 so let us finish this meeting? 20:01:23 did you already talk about the new homepage? 20:01:38 you wanted to contact chteuchteu.. 20:01:40 I said, that I asked chteuch just today 20:01:50 so he had no chance to answer, yet :( 20:01:58 i c 20:02:05 it's ok 20:02:15 as I still have a lot of pages to move to the Guide 20:02:18 ;) 20:02:20 yeah! 20:02:38 it will be all so beautiful! 20:02:51 #endmeeting