13:59:17 #startmeeting ux team 13:59:17 Meeting started Tue Jan 21 13:59:17 2020 UTC. The chair is antonela. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 13:59:19 hello folks 13:59:27 still in January, do you believe? lol 13:59:36 Hi o/ 13:59:40 pad here > https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-ux-team-2020-keep 13:59:41 hola o/ 13:59:46 * antonela is writing 14:00:05 it does feel like a long month... :/ 14:00:49 pili: indeed 14:03:41 oki, lets start 14:04:42 thanks for taking #3544 diogosergio 14:04:49 let me know if you have any question about it 14:05:04 hiro has been working on setting up the roadmap for the website on 2020 14:05:21 Yes, I had some issues with my virtualbox, but all sorted now, so should have a flow next couple days. 14:05:34 diogosergio: cool, we can review it in brussels :) 14:05:42 are you ok with your presentation, do you need any help? 14:05:51 i think we can review those and check dependencies to coordinate the months, pili what do you think? 14:06:19 sounds good :) 14:06:40 Yeah, so far so good. Thanks 14:06:51 diogosergio: cool 14:08:11 so looking at https://dip.torproject.org/torproject/web/www-roadmap/blob/master/2020.md 14:08:25 we will have dev.tpo until march 14:08:43 yup 14:08:54 then search (!good stuff) 14:09:25 and then Q3 for the metrics portal which seems ok since Simply secure will start to work on it in Feb/March i think 14:09:39 we will meet them to coordinate this as well 14:09:46 maybe we can catch nina in fosdem pili 14:10:04 antonela: where can I find some more details on the Simply secure project? 14:10:11 sure! 14:10:35 I was trying to add it to my master calendar but realised I have no details about it :) 14:10:39 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tAnQN8eqG5W-nA6kJppNJkpNGEkSyGg3kUFRDhUBm-M 14:10:48 pili ^ the metrics work sow 14:11:35 sent to you via email pili too 14:12:00 about the blog, is there anything needed on my side hiro? 14:12:09 thank you! I'll take a look 14:12:14 well we will have to design it at some point 14:12:16 like checking templates and make sure that it looks close to the styleguide 14:12:17 oki 14:12:24 it will be a lektor website 14:12:32 if we go this route 14:12:43 oh cool 14:12:58 lektor + discourse? 14:13:07 yep 14:13:08 that's the idea 14:13:31 discourse will only be the comments 14:13:45 so I think it will have the same structure of all our websites 14:14:25 but we might have to figure out where to put things like tags and so on... 14:14:50 oki, so we are groot there 14:15:17 i'd add something like "WWW mantainance" which doesnt needs to be you but me or another person closing www related tickets 14:15:30 but we have some note that we have it considered in your roadmap 14:17:43 anything else re www? 14:17:55 im thinking about community.tpo 14:18:21 there are some things that still need work, like /onion-services but that is on comms and community roadmaps, am i right pili? 14:18:48 yes that's right 14:18:51 yup 14:19:02 i have this general proposal about folder names for lektors :D 14:19:35 i added to discussion 14:20:28 emmapeel: +1 14:20:45 do we want to slowly update existing ones? 14:20:47 go for it emmapeel 14:20:58 what is the idea/plan? 14:20:59 I guess we'd have to have redirects also 14:21:32 maybe i can explain why, or everybody sees the advantages of avoiding to name folder topic-N in the websites, and have the folder be named how-to-verify-signature instead? 14:21:48 i thin this is more a thing for support portal than community portal 14:21:52 *think 14:22:01 not sure about the old ones, but specially the new ones 14:22:07 the problem is the url? 14:22:12 yeah, but it can start happening in other places 14:22:17 like right now we have support.tpo.org/tbb/tbb-2 14:22:23 is that the example? 14:22:26 yeah 14:22:31 i agree yes 14:22:56 how we can do it on large scale? renaming one by one? 14:23:01 and updating docs? 14:23:35 i am not sure about the old content, we should keep the URLs working, maybe with a redirect 14:24:10 Can lektor generate pages using say a databag and model without contents.lr? 14:24:53 not sure. hiro? 14:25:04 i think so RotationMatrix, the problem is the links we already have in place 14:25:27 maybe we can move this discussion to the www meeting this week; i think is a good idea having semantic urls 14:25:30 Thinking you could have a redirects databag and have lektor serve html redirects for those pages. 14:26:19 htaccess rules might work better though. 14:26:43 yeah we have some .htacess stuff already 14:26:59 it's a nice to have thing or we must have? 14:28:44 my proposal is specially about new content 14:29:03 not sure about the old one, but new content should have semantic urls 14:29:06 i think is a good thing to have, we can continue in this way or we can discuss this issue now so new content can be right placed 14:30:05 sure. sorry lets move on 14:30:43 cool, thanks for the suggestion emmapeel - do you have a dip ticket for it? 14:30:52 no, i can open one tho 14:31:47 super, thanks! 14:31:57 anything else regarding urls? 14:32:16 emmapeel: open it in support repo? 14:32:27 ggus: ok! 14:34:16 what else folks? 14:34:37 i shared a draft from a working group at ietf trying to spec end-users, is interesting and somewhat fun 14:34:59 i dont have anything else for today, i should work with onions 14:35:48 Nothing else from my side. 14:36:48 oki, we end in the l337 hour 14:36:50 thanks folks! 14:36:54 see you somewhere :) 14:36:56 #endmeeting