00:14:00 #startmeeting s55 IPv6 project 00:14:00 Meeting started Thu Apr 2 00:14:00 2020 UTC. The chair is ahf. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 00:14:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 00:14:04 Are we expecting nickm? 00:14:14 teor: before we start, would you be OK with moving the mentors meeting to tomorrow. nickm is out for the evening 00:14:27 nickm said he wouldn't be here, no 00:14:35 That's fine. What time? 00:14:44 should do the thursday time you proposed in the email? 00:14:46 gaba: is that OK? 00:14:56 yes 00:15:14 ok, let's do that. if nick can't make it tomorrow at that time (i don't remember his answer on the mail thread) then i can sync with him before 00:15:37 ok 00:15:47 I haven't had time to check my mail today 00:15:52 teor: 2 applications we have for gsoc? 00:15:56 no worries, it's early still 8) 00:16:01 how is s55 going this week? 00:16:15 gaba: we can't talk about gsoc or outreachy in public 00:16:29 uh, thanks . i keep forgetting 00:16:30 yeah, we probably need to keep that one internal :-S 00:17:04 let's talk over voice when we're done with the sponsor 55 sync? 00:17:05 https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-s55-ipv6-project-keep is the pad for today 00:17:17 yep 00:18:11 how is s55 going? 00:18:14 So for the status update: 00:18:19 We merged #32588 00:18:26 nice 00:19:01 And I am writing unit tests for #33633 00:19:29 hm, my trac connection is very slow today. loading it 00:20:14 cool! 00:20:45 I am still spending a lot of time on GSOC and Outreachy, I have handed over some tickets to ahf and nickm 00:21:14 I am also trying to limit myself to 2 updates for each applicant per week 00:21:14 yes, i'm a bit behind on reviews this week... i am going to look at those tomorrow morning when i have had some sleep 00:21:28 yep 00:22:07 I haven't seen many network-team people answering tor-dev or tor-relays emails. 00:22:36 But I have reminded the network-health team that they should be answering relay operator bandwidth emails, because they are working on sbws. 00:23:01 I've been mostly staying off IRC, and it seems people are answering questions there. 00:23:23 yeah, i think we are doing OK with IRC right now, but ML's are not so good 00:23:51 In general, I am trying to match the effort put in by the other person. 00:24:00 hm, which tor-dev@ thread is missing answers? i thought i was reasonably up-to-date on that? 00:24:06 i'm not up-to-date on tor-relays@ 00:24:44 For example, if they write a 1 sentence email without a relay fingerprint, I respond by pointing them to the relevant wiki or man page docs. 00:25:05 on -relays? 00:25:29 Generally, yet 00:25:30 * yes 00:25:43 makes sense 00:25:46 cool 00:26:22 okay, so extends is the big thing for next week? 00:26:26 and reachability 00:26:27 ? 00:26:49 Probably just extends. It's hard to say. I'm working against a lot of technical debt here. 00:27:01 Large functions, no unit tests, limited comments. 00:27:10 did you get setup on the server? 00:27:30 I have found a number of IPv6 address handling bugs in the last few weeks. 00:27:45 ahf: I haven't looked yet, I was waiting until I had something useful 00:27:53 oki, fair enough 00:28:04 if there is anything with it and i'm not around at your hours, just drop me an email with the problem 00:28:11 Thanks! 00:28:38 In general, I'd like to know what the minimum standards are for pull requests, answering emails, and being on IRC. 00:28:46 It would be great if we could agree that as a team. 00:29:06 for speed? 00:29:10 or quality? :-) 00:29:21 Both :-) 00:29:28 Think of them as service levels? 00:29:43 email to my inbox i think people should have an answer on within my next day from i wake up 00:30:02 but i don't know what others think 00:30:12 That would be nice, sometimes I go two or three days without checking emails, so I can concentrate 00:30:26 But yeah this is a team conversation, I think 00:30:28 this is a conversation for a moment where the whole team is in 00:30:39 yeah 00:30:40 :-) 00:30:43 agreed 00:30:51 i read email in the morning and before going off 00:31:01 and if peopl tell me on irc 00:31:13 do we have more for s55 for now? or should jump to voice for the gsoc/outreachy stuff? 00:31:53 ahf: i though we were going to skip it for when nick is around tomorrow 00:31:57 Yeah let's do gsoc/outreachy? 00:32:09 gaba: just to answer the question you had i think? 00:32:14 and then we do the real meeting tomorrow? 00:32:14 ah, ok 00:32:15 yes 00:32:17 or maybe that isn't needed? 00:32:37 Should we just discuss it tomorrow with nickm? 00:32:43 teor: your call. I can wait until tomorrow 00:32:44 yeah, let's wait to tomorrow then 00:32:52 thanks teor for the updates on this 00:32:58 I can wait, I'd rather concentrate on Sponsor 55 00:33:00 i'm gonna do an endmeeting cmd 00:33:04 #endmeeting