16:00:21 #startmeeting network-health 2024-09-23 16:00:21 Meeting started Mon Sep 23 16:00:21 2024 UTC. The chair is hiro. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 16:00:30 o/ 16:00:49 ok first of all welcome @sarthikg ... but he is in a meeting 16:00:56 woo! 16:01:11 then the pad: https://pad.riseup.net/p/tor-nethealthteam-2023-keep 16:02:07 @ggus since you have to go is there anything from your side? 16:02:50 hiro: we should start organizing our agenda for the next meetup. 16:03:27 yes! do you know if the otf report is going to be presented? 16:04:19 i'm not sure, but it will be public in october 16:05:19 (the report) 16:05:30 ok I added that to the agenda as I was wondering if people wanted to discuss that 16:06:51 We might have to figure out a few things too as there will be possibly many questions from the community about the press article from last week 16:07:02 yess 16:07:30 juga: how hard is https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/team/-/issues/366? 16:07:50 i think we should talk about the *health* aspect of it and not exactly about the attack(s) 16:07:51 b ut the date is oct 26th right? 16:07:57 hiro: correct 16:08:10 one week before i have other tor activity 16:08:14 ok then we have time to discuss this when you come back 16:08:34 GeKo: not sure cause it's a grafana thing, maybe i can manage to overcome that with vm or maybe it isn't fixable, i don't know 16:09:26 where can i find the metrics reference on how we calculate guard/exit probability, for example here: https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#aggregate/cc 16:09:39 i'm also finding limits that i'll comment in the issue for the uptime graphs 16:10:10 okay 16:11:02 @ggus hold on that is based on consensus weight 16:11:54 https://metrics.torproject.org/reproducible-metrics.html#servers 16:12:05 hiro: ty! 16:12:45 hiro: i've done https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/analysis/-/issues/67#note_3079577 and thought a bit about that 16:13:16 while the math is not hard for cases where the non-exit weight of exits is 0 16:13:32 we'll need to think about how to count the bytes properly when this is not the case 16:13:40 yep I have been thinking about that too... what are your thoughts? 16:13:49 not sure yet :) 16:13:54 the current code on the website is possibly broken to estimate onion service traffic 16:14:02 i need to dig a bit deeper 16:14:04 oh? 16:14:11 and I was just thinking to go through that for descriptorParser 16:14:11 how so? 16:14:24 well not the traffic but I think the number of onions yes 16:14:33 we know it's broken for the number of onions 16:14:34 and then I am concerned there is some bug for the traffic too 16:14:42 ah, okay 16:14:58 because that is one of the first thing I did in 2021 when I started with metrics 16:15:13 and I used step by step an old mr by karsten and some help from asn 16:15:26 and I didn't revist it ever since 16:15:35 *revisit 16:16:36 so my idea was to add this to descriptorParser, to start having onion s tats there 16:17:30 and since you have started working on https://bugs.torproject.org/tpo/network-health/analysis/67 we might find some other things that need to be fixed 16:18:09 could be. it's been a while that folks looked at this kind of stuff... 16:20:33 yep 16:21:45 GeKo on a side note, next week is p112 meeting right? 16:23:24 yes 16:23:39 1500 utc on tue oct 1 16:23:45 could you invite sarthikg to it? 16:23:59 i'll remind folks on monday 16:24:08 for the tagtor stuff you mean? 16:24:13 otherwise we are almost done 16:24:22 kind of... 16:24:41 yep I was thinking it could be helpful, what do you think? 16:25:09 the tagtor stuff is usually only the first part 16:25:20 i am fine with that if you feel that hour is worth for him 16:25:34 maybe getting used to sponsor meetings etc. 16:25:47 aka project meetings, heh 16:25:47 s/sponsor/project 16:25:52 hehe 16:25:53 faster 16:25:55 :) 16:25:56 I thought having an idea of how and why we did tagtor 16:26:21 well, yes, but that could be done with the onboarding 16:26:31 i don't think we'll talk much about that in the p112 sync 16:26:35 and yeah the meetings too.. 16:27:09 yeah I went through that... well ok then one more meeting is better maybe since it is already late for him 16:27:17 s/more/less 16:27:33 i'd think so but don't have a strong opinion here 16:28:09 yeah that's ok, less meetings is better I think 16:29:11 ok I do not have anything else from my side... @geko @juga? 16:29:19 i'm fine 16:29:26 me too 16:29:33 ok then! 16:29:36 o/ 16:29:48 is that a bye @ggus? or a raised hand? 16:29:48 (saying good bye) 16:29:51 haha 16:30:00 #endmeeting